Fundamentals of Molecular Biology. Part 1: Molecular Cell Biology - A. N. Ogurtsov 2011

Photosynthetic Carbon Fixation
Competition between Photorespiration and Photosynthesis

Photosynthesis is invariably accompanied by Photorespiration, a light-dependent process that consumes O2 and partially converts ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate into СО2.

The enzyme rubisco (ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase) catalyzes two competing reactions (Figure 190):

✵ in one of them (СО2 fixation), СО2 is added to ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate to yield two molecules of 3-phosphoglycerate,

✵ in the other (photorespiration), O2 is added to ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate to yield one molecule of 3-phosphoglycerate and one two-carbon molecule of phosphoglycolate.

Photorespiration is costly for The Cell, as it consumes ATP and O2 while synthesizing СО2. Notably, however, all known rubisco Enzymes catalyze photorespiration.

Class="center">

Figure 190 - Competition between carbon fixation (1) and photorespiration (2)

Apparently, the specific geometric and amino acid Features of the Active Site required for the СО2 fixation reaction prevented the enzyme from evolving in a way that avoids catalyzing energy-costly photorespiratory reactions.

In hot, dry weather, plants close their gas-exchange pores (Stomata) on leaves to conserve moisture. This causes the internal СО2 concentration in leaves to drop below the threshold required for rubisco activation; consequently, The rate of photosynthetic СО2 fixation plummets, favoring photorespiration.

To avoid such metabolic "switching," plants adapted to hot and arid climates (such as corn, sugarcane, and African millet) have evolved a two-stage СО2 fixation process in which СО2 accumulation precedes The Calvin Cycle.

This metabolic pathway is known as the C4-pathway, because its initial products are four-carbon compounds such as oxaloacetate and malate (rather than the three-carbon molecules that initiate the Calvin cycle). The C4-pathway operates in two distinct types of plant Cells (Figure 191):

1) mesophyll cells, which are located near the leaf surface and can acquire СО2 directly from the atmosphere,

2) bundle sheath cells, which surround the vascular tissue (xylem and phloem, through which biological fluids circulate within the plant).

Figure 191 - Leaf anatomy of C4 plants

In the mesophyll cells of C4 plants, phosphoenolpyruvate—a tricarboxylic molecule produced by Pyruvate phosphorylation—reacts with СО2 to form oxaloacetate, a four-carbon compound (Figure 192). The enzyme phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase, which catalyzes this reaction, is found almost exclusively in C4 plants and, unlike rubisco, is insensitive to СО2 concentration.

The overall reaction converting pyruvate to oxaloacetate involves the Hydrolysis of one phosphoanhydride bond in ATP and is accompanied by a decrease in Free energy (∆G < 0). As a result, СО2 fixation proceeds efficiently even under very low СО2 concentrations.

Oxaloacetate produced in mesophyll cells is reduced to malate, which is then transported by specialized carriers into the bundle sheath cells of C4 plants, where СО2 is released via decarboxylation and enters the Calvin cycle (Figure 192).

Figure 192 - Scheme of the C4 carbon fixation pathway

Due to the supply of СО2 from mesophyll cells, the intracellular СО2 concentration in the bundle sheath cells of C4 plants is much higher than in the surrounding atmosphere. Bundle sheath cells also differ in lacking Photosystem II (PSII) and relying exclusively on cyclic electron flow driven by Photosystem I (PSI), which does not require molecular oxygen (O2).

The elevated СО2 and low O2 concentrations in the bundle sheath cells of C4 plants promote СО2 fixation by rubisco into 3-phosphoglycerate while inhibiting The Use of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate in photorespiration.

In contrast, within the mesophyll cells of C3 plants, high atmospheric O2 concentrations favor photorespiration (pathway 2 in Figure 190). As a result, up to 50% of the carbon fixed by rubisco can be re-oxidized back into СО2 in C3 plants.

C4 plants outperform C3 plants in utilizing available СО2 because the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase enzyme in C4 plants has a higher affinity for СО2 than rubisco does in the Calvin cycle of C3 plants. However, the C4 cycle consumes one phosphodiester bond of ATP (during The formation of phosphoenolpyruvate from pyruvate); consequently, the net yield of sugar photosynthesis utilizing NADPH and ATP is lower in C4 plants than in C3 plants, which rely solely on the Calvin cycle for СО2 fixation.

Nevertheless, the average rate of photosynthesis in C4 plants such as corn or sugarcane can be 2 to 3 times higher than in comparable C3 plants such as wheat, rice, or oats, because C4 plants lack the losses associated with photorespiration.

Self-check questions

1. What process is known as the Calvin cycle?

2. What are C3 plants? How do they differ from C4 plants?

3. What reaction does the rubisco enzyme catalyze?

4. Which enzyme of the Calvin cycle is considered the most abundant enzyme on Earth?

5. How many molecules of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate are exported from the chloroplast stroma into the cell Cytosol as a result of fixing six CO2 molecules in the Calvin cycle?

6. What two processes facilitate the increased transport of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate from the chloroplast to the cytosol?

7. What mechanisms regulate The activity of Calvin cycle enzymes?

8. What process is referred to as photorespiration?

9. Why is photorespiration disadvantageous for the cell?

10. Which enzyme catalyzes both CO2 fixation and photorespiration?

11. Why has rubisco not evolved to avoid catalyzing energy-wasting photorespiratory reactions?

12. What is the physiological Significance of the two-stage CO2 fixation process in C4 plants?

13. In which cell types does the C4 pathway take place?

14. What are the fundamental differences between the C4 and C3 pathways?



Last update: 12/08/2026

Editorial and Educational Adaptation: This material has been compiled based on the primary/original source text. The project team performed an editorial review, corrected technical inaccuracies, structured sections, and adapted the content for an educational format.

What was processed:

  • elimination of formatting defects (OCR errors, structural breaks, corrupted characters);
  • editorial organization of content;
  • standardization of terminology in accordance with academic sources;
  • verification of factual statements against the original source text.

All mentions of the author, publication year, and origin of the primary text have been preserved in accordance with the source.