GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY - T.P. Pyrog - 2004

9. YEASTS

9.5. TAXONOMY AND SYSTEMATICS OF YEASTS

The first scientific Classification of Yeasts was developed in 1896 by the Danish mycologist E.C. Hansen. He grouped spore-forming yeasts into eight genera within the family Saccharomycetaceae. The most prominent classifications published in the first half of the 20th century were those developed by the Dutch school led by J. Lodder and N.J.W. Kreger-van Rij (1952), and by the Soviet scientist V.I. Kudryavtsev (1954). The former classification was primarily based on the morphological and physiological properties of yeasts, whereas the latter, In addition to these features, took into account the specific habitats of the species and their environmental adaptation. A major milestone in Yeast systematics was the application of genosystematics, which involves The Study of life cycles, mating concepts, and Hybridization. Until recently, most researchers classified yeasts into three subphyla within the division Eumycota (kingdom Mycota): Ascomycotina, Basidiomycotina, and Fungi Imperfecti (Deuteromycotina). Ascomycetes form asci containing endogenous sexual spores, Basidiomycetes produce teliospores and basidia-like sporophores bearing exogenous sexual spores, while deuteromycetes form exclusively asexual spores and lack a sexual reproductive cycle.

In 1984, a classification by N.J.W. Kreger-van Rij was published, which remained the most comprehensive for nearly 16 years (Table 9.1).

Class="center">Table 9.1

Yeast classification (1984)

Division Eumycota

Subdivision

Class

Order

Family

Genus (selected representatives)




Spermophtoraceae

Metschnikowla

Аsсоmycotina

Hemiascomycetea

Endomycetalea

Saccharomycetaceae

Lipomyces

Debarycmyces

Hansenula

Pichia

Saccharomycea



Filobasidialea

Filobasidiaceae

Filobasidium

Besidiomycotina

Basidiomycetes

Uatilagmales

Teliospore-forming yeasts

Rhodosporidium

Tremellalea

Sirobasidiaceee

Sirobasidium




Tremellaceae

Tremella

Deutero-

mycotina

Blastomycetee

_

Cryptococcaceae

Candida

Cryptococcue Rhodotorula

Trichosporon

Trigonopsis




Sporobolomycetaceae

Burvlla

Spnrvbotomyces

Similar to the systematics of prokaryotes and micromycetes, the Application of Molecular biology and Genetic Methods in yeast research—such as DNA and RNA sequencing data (particularly regarding the conserved 18S rRNA and specific domains of 28S rRNA), restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis, and cellular Protein Electrophoresis—has challenged the traditional yeast classification.

In 1998, the fourth edition of The Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study, edited by American scientists C.P. Kurtzman and J.W. Fell, was published. According to this edition, asporogenous deuteromycetous yeasts do not constitute an independent taxonomic group, but rather belong to the ascomycetous and basidiomycetous yeasts. In 2000, C.P. Kurtzman published a phylogenetic classification of yeasts (Table 9.2).

Table 9.2

Placement of asporogenous yeasts in Kurtzman's classification (2000)

Class

Order

Family

Genus (not all genera listed)

Herruascomycetes

Saccharomycetales (syn. Endomycetales)

Candidaceae

Blastobotrya Brettanomyces Candida Sympodiomyces Trigonopis

Basidiomycetous yeasts (Anamorphic taxon)

Sporobolomycetaceae

Sporobolomycea

Rhodotorula

Cryptococcaceae

Burella Cryptococcua Trichoaporon

It should be noted that today the very term "asporogenous" (or imperfect) yeasts is no longer accurate. Because these yeasts have been reassigned to ascomycetes or basidiomycetes, they are presumed capable of sexual reproduction; however, the specific conditions required for their sexual cycle have yet to be identified or established.



Last update: 12/08/2026

Editorial and Educational Adaptation: This material has been compiled based on the primary/original source text. The project team performed an editorial review, corrected technical inaccuracies, structured sections, and adapted the content for an educational format.

What was processed:

  • elimination of formatting defects (OCR errors, structural breaks, corrupted characters);
  • editorial organization of content;
  • standardization of terminology in accordance with academic sources;
  • verification of factual statements against the original source text.

All mentions of the author, publication year, and origin of the primary text have been preserved in accordance with the source.