PLANT REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY - N. L. Kolyasnikova - 2017
Appendix 1
Microsporogenesis and microsporogametogenesis in alfalfa (Medicago sativa)
Species |
Bud length, mm |
Stages of microsporogametogenesis |
|||||||||||
Archesporium |
PI |
MI |
AI |
TI |
PII |
M II |
AII |
TII |
Microspore tetrads |
UNP |
BNP |
||
Alfalfa |
3.2 |
+ |
|||||||||||
4.5 |
+ |
||||||||||||
4.7 |
+ |
+ |
|||||||||||
5.1 |
+ |
||||||||||||
5.5 |
+ |
||||||||||||
6.0 |
+ |
+ |
|||||||||||
6.5 |
+ |
+ |
|||||||||||
6.7 |
+ |
+ |
|||||||||||
Note: PI – prophase I; M I – metaphase I; A I – anaphase I; T I – telophase I; P II – prophase II; M II – metaphase II; A II – anaphase II; T II – telophase II;
UNP – uninucleate pollen grain; BNP – binucleate pollen grain.
Appendix 2
Pollen grain fertility in certain plant species
Plant species |
Total number of pollen grains |
Fertile pollen grains |
Sterile pollen grains |
|||
unstained |
small |
shrivelled |
other |
|||
Littleleaf linden |
16 |
15 |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
14 |
12 |
1 |
- |
1 |
- |
|
15 |
14 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
|
10 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
|
14 |
11 |
1 |
- |
2 |
- |
|
19 |
17 |
- |
1 |
1 |
- |
|
11 |
10 |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
|
16 |
14 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
|
10 |
9 |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
|
15 |
13 |
1 |
- |
1 |
- |
|
Total |
140 |
123 |
7 |
2 |
8 |
- |
Fertility, % |
87.9 |
|||||
Plant species |
Total number of pollen grains |
Fertile pollen grains |
Sterile pollen grains |
|||
unstained |
small |
shrivelled |
other |
|||
Usambara violet |
12 |
10 |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
10 |
10 |
- |
- |
- |
||
15 |
12 |
2 |
1 |
- |
- |
|
10 |
9 |
1 |
- |
- |
||
14 |
11 |
1 |
2 |
- |
- |
|
12 |
11 |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
|
9 |
8 |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
|
15 |
14 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
|
11 |
10 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
|
10 |
9 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
|
Total |
118 |
104 |
8 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
Fertility, % |
88.1 |
|||||
Appendix 3
Pollen grain viability in Usambara violet
Item No. |
Total number of pollen grains |
Pollen with germinating pollen tubes |
Non-viable pollen |
||
no pollen tubes |
several pollen tubes |
other |
|||
1 |
13 |
8 |
4 |
1 |
- |
2 |
9 |
6 |
3 |
- |
- |
3 |
10 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
- |
4 |
8 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
- |
5 |
12 |
8 |
4 |
- |
- |
6 |
11 |
8 |
2 |
1 |
- |
7 |
12 |
7 |
5 |
- |
- |
8 |
10 |
7 |
2 |
1 |
- |
9 |
8 |
5 |
3 |
- |
- |
10 |
9 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
- |
Σ |
102 |
62 |
32 |
8 |
0 |
Viability, % |
60.8 |
||||
Appendix 4
Laboratory seed germination in certain plant species
Item No. |
Plant species |
Number of seeds |
Seed germination, % |
||||
normally germinated |
ungerminated |
in light |
in dark |
||||
in light |
in dark |
in light |
in dark |
||||
1 |
White mustard |
43 |
45 |
7 |
5 |
86 |
90 |
2 |
Red fescue |
47 |
48 |
3 |
2 |
94 |
96 |
3 |
Broadleaf plantain |
47 |
26 |
3 |
24 |
94 |
52 |
4 |
French marigold |
26 |
35 |
24 |
15 |
52 |
70 |
5 |
Siberian peashrub |
46 |
44 |
4 |
6 |
92 |
88 |
6 |
Blue spruce |
16 |
9 |
34 |
41 |
32 |
18 |
7 |
Common ninebark |
10 |
19 |
40 |
31 |
20 |
38 |
8 |
European ash |
4 |
15 |
46 |
35 |
8 |
30 |
9 |
Garden radish |
47 |
41 |
3 |
9 |
94 |
82 |
10 |
Cinnamon rose, dog rose |
0 |
0 |
50 |
50 |
0 |
0 |
Note: the table presents the results of a single experiment
Appendix 5
Characteristics of main seedling categories in seed germination assessment
Germinated seeds |
Ungerminated seeds |
||||
Normally germinated |
Swollen |
Hard |
Decayed |
Abnormally germinated |
|
Well-developed roots, cotyledons, hypocotyl, epicotyl |
Have not germinated by the time of evaluation, but appear healthy. Do not crush under forceps pressure |
Have not swollen or changed appearance by the end of the germination period |
Seeds with soft, decomposed endosperm or perisperm, blackened or decayed embryo, rotted roots, cotyledons, plumule, etc. |
Show developmental abnormalities: lacking embryonic roots, or with weak, watery roots; plumule absent or decayed; abnormalities in coleoptile development. Cotyledons lost by more than 1/3 or completely, abnormally enlarged with a shortened hypocotyl |
|
Appendix 6
Recording seed infestation by mold fungi
Degree of seed infection |
Seeds covered with mold fungi |
Low |
Up to 5% |
Moderate |
Up to 25% |
High |
Over 25% |
Appendix 7
Potential seed productivity (PSP) per shoot in littleleaf linden (2015)
No. |
Number of inflorescences |
Number of flowers per inflorescence |
Number of ovules per flower |
PSP |
|
M±m |
V,% |
||||
1 |
50 |
4,5±0,26 |
5,8 |
5 |
1125 |
2 |
44 |
3,5±0,21 |
6,0 |
5 |
770 |
3 |
48 |
3,3±0,23 |
7,0 |
5 |
792 |
4 |
55 |
3,8±0,20 |
5,3 |
5 |
1045 |
5 |
42 |
2,2±0,22 |
10,0 |
5 |
770 |
6 |
45 |
3,6±0,18 |
5,0 |
5 |
810 |
7 |
56 |
3,6±0,25 |
6,9 |
5 |
1008 |
8 |
57 |
3,2±0,18 |
5,6 |
5 |
912 |
9 |
53 |
3,0±0,20 |
6,7 |
5 |
795 |
10 |
67 |
2,5±0,23 |
9,2 |
5 |
838 |
Note:
М = ΣX : N;
m=± √ V-Хn) : (N-1)
V= m : М х 100%
PSP = number of inflorescences × number of flowers × number of ovules
Appendix 8
Potential seed productivity (PSP) of little-leaf linden per shoot (2015)
No. |
Number of inflorescences |
Number of fruits per inflorescence |
Number of seeds per fruit |
RSP |
Kpr |
|
М ±m |
V,% |
|||||
1 |
36 |
2,5±0,26 |
10,4 |
1 |
90 |
8 |
2 |
43 |
3,1±0,30 |
9,7 |
1 |
133 |
17 |
3 |
40 |
2,1±0,28 |
13,3 |
1 |
84 |
11 |
4 |
42 |
2,4±0,29 |
12,1 |
1 |
100 |
9,5 |
5 |
45 |
2,6±0,27 |
10,4 |
1 |
117 |
12 |
6 |
47 |
3,1±0,30 |
9,7 |
1 |
139 |
17 |
7 |
38 |
2,4±0,27 |
11,2 |
1 |
91 |
9 |
8 |
38 |
3,1±0,29 |
9,3 |
1 |
117 |
13 |
9 |
43 |
2,0±0,20 |
10,0 |
1 |
86 |
7 |
10 |
38 |
1,7±0,28 |
16,5 |
1 |
65 |
5,3 |
Note:
RSP = number of inflorescences × number of fruits × number of seeds